To reason analogically is to reason that because two or more things or types of things are
alike in some one or more respects (we may call this the antecedent resemblance), they will therefore
be found alike in some other respect(s) - the consequent resemblance. In cases of reliable analogies the
antecedent factor is already known to have some bearing on the consequent factor. In faulty analogies such
knowledge is lacking. The form of the argument is: B is like C in respect D; therefore B is like C in respect E.
'Last quarter I had a student by the name of Orzymski who
did good work. This quarter I have another student by that name, and
I'm expecting good work from him.'